CostingEnergy mass balanceEquipment sizingCarbon footprintE-fuels
E-methanol maritime import chain to an MtJ site
Sea leg of an e-methanol supply to a Methanol-to-Jet plant: export and import tank farms plus a chartered tanker shuttle. Fleet size and calls, bunker fuel and its well-to-wake CO2, delivered transport cost in EUR/t and EUR/MWh, and the e_td term for the carbon intensity. Sized in kt/a of methanol delivered.
- CurrencyEUR 2023
- Battery limitinstalled
- 64 documented assumptions
- Updated2 Nov 2026
Mass and energy balance
What the asset draws and delivers for the case and load you choose.
Reference case
Shortest sea route from the export to the import port, in km (1 nmi = 1.852 km). Default 12,174 km is Saudi Arabia to Germany in Hampp et al. 2023 Table 2; the range runs from Denmark (812 km) to Australia (20,284 km) in the same table. It drives voyage time, ship-days and bunker fuel.
Flows
- In: E-methanol at the export terminal—
Asset
E-methanol maritime import chain (export terminal, tanker shuttle, import terminal)
- Out: E-methanol landed at the import terminal—
Annual quantities at the current usage. Band width: share of energy in; non-energy flows are not to scale.
E-methanol landed at the import terminal per year, in kt/a. 1,000 kt/a is about 125 t/h for an MtJ plant running 8,000 h/a (#486/#489 range: ~6 to 380 t/h). Below 900 kt/a the chain keeps at least monthly calls, so each call is a part cargo on a shared chemical tanker (see Model).
- Fleet size
- — ships
- Calls per year (whole)
- — trips/year
- Parcel per call
- — t
- Tank volume per terminal
- — m3
CAPEX
Specific cost at this size, what backs it, and how it behaves with scale.
Specific CAPEX at this size
—
Reference size 900 kt/a
TNO 2023 parcel sizing
Model value: two tank farms sized to one parcel plus 25 % (TNO 2023) at 169.79 EUR/m3 (Hampp et al. 2023). Customized: your own terminal CAPEX per t/a of throughput, used as is at every throughput and no longer sourced.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
- Ex-factory
- Installed· this figure
- Fully financed
Included
- Equipment
- Installation, civil works and engineering
Not included
- Working capital
- Contingency
Added at project level
- Working capital layer, from the project settings
- Contingency, from the project settings
Project figures
Values passed to project mode when this asset is added to a project.
E-methanol maritime import chain (export terminal, tanker shuttle, import terminal)Concept sketch, not to scale · drag to rotate
- E-methanol at the export terminal in
- —
- E-methanol landed at the import terminal outMain product
- —
- CAPEX to the battery limit
- —
- Fixed O&M
- —
- Variable O&M, excluding feedstocks
- —
- Asset lifetime
- 30 years
Log in to add this asset to a project.
Delivered sea-transport cost
A standalone indicator for a quick read. Project mode recomputes it for the whole system.
—
- Cost - vessel charter—
- Cost - bunker fuel—
- Cost - export and import terminals—
- Cost - port and canal dues—
Linked to the balance above
Shortest sea route from the export to the import port, in km (1 nmi = 1.852 km). Default 12,174 km is Saudi Arabia to Germany in Hampp et al. 2023 Table 2; the range runs from Denmark (812 km) to Australia (20,284 km) in the same table. It drives voyage time, ship-days and bunker fuel.
Time-charter equivalent of the tanker, in USD per day: it pays the ship, crew and maintenance, not bunker or port costs. Default 32,181 USD/d is the 2023 average product-tanker earning (UNCTAD RMT 2024, Clarksons); 2022 averaged 38,053 USD/d and MR spot rates were 6,822 USD/d in 2021. Converted at the 2023 ECB average, 1.0813 USD/EUR.
Price of the marine gas oil burned at sea, in EUR per MWh (LHV). Default 65 EUR/MWh is the diesel price He et al. 2026 use for methanol shipping in 2025.
Not included by default: PTX-BOA leaves port and canal charges out, and no published methanol figure was found. Enter your own dues per t delivered to add them.
Real discount rate used to annualise the terminal CAPEX over 30 years. Default 5 % is the international shipping WACC of PTX-BOA; Hampp et al. 2023 also run 10 %.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
Benchmarks
This model's figures against published references and reference cases.
Model vessel cost on the Chalmers route, EUR/MWh
4 He et al. 2026 §3.2
Model fuel cost on the Chalmers route, EUR/MWh
3 He et al. 2026 §3.2
Delivered sea-transport cost (energy basis), EUR/MWh
8 He et al. 2026 §3.2
22 He et al. 2026 §3.2
Reference cases at this size and usage
Log in to compare the reference cases.
All results
Every model output at the current settings, grouped, with the sensitivity charts.
70 outputs · 5 groups · 18 also shown above, dimmed
Delivered cost
16- Vessel cost (energy basis)
- ComputingEUR/MWh
- Fuel cost (energy basis)
- ComputingEUR/MWh
- Terminal share of the cost
- Computing%
- Charter cost with a dedicated whole-ship fleet
- ComputingEUR/t
- Total annual transport cost
- ComputingEUR/year
- Vessel charter per year
- ComputingEUR/year
- Bunker fuel per year
- ComputingEUR/year
- Port and canal dues per year
- ComputingEUR/year
- Charter price in EUR
- ComputingEUR/d
Fleet and voyage
18- Fleet (fractional)
- Computingships
- Fleet load penalty
- Computingratio
- Fleet utilisation
- Computing%
- Calls per year
- Computingtrips/year
- Parcel share of the ship
- Computing%
- Full-ship loads per year
- Computingloads/year
- Round-trip time
- Computingd
- Round-trip time (hours)
- Computingh
- Sailing time per round trip
- Computingh
- Sailing share of the round trip
- Computing%
- Ship-days per year
- Computingd/year
- Fleet sailing hours per year
- Computingh/year
- Round-trip distance
- Computingkm
- Methanol energy delivered
- ComputingMWh/year
Bunker and emissions
11- Transport emissions (e_td)
- ComputinggCO2e/MJ
- Tanker energy demand
- ComputingMWh/km
- Tanker specific consumption
- ComputingWh/(t.km)
- Bunker per t delivered
- ComputingMWh/t
- Bunker fuel energy per year
- ComputingMWh/year
- Bunker energy over cargo energy
- Computing%
- Bunker fuel mass per year
- Computingt/year
- Bunker CO2 at the stack
- Computingt/year
- Bunker GHG, well-to-wake
- ComputingtCO2e/year
- MGO well-to-wake factor
- ComputinggCO2e/MJ
Terminals
14- Terminal CAPEX
- ComputingMEUR
- Reference specific terminal CAPEX
- ComputingEUR/(t/a)
- Specific terminal CAPEX, model value
- ComputingEUR/(t/a)
- Tank volume, both terminals
- Computingm3
- Implied tank cost per m3
- ComputingEUR/m3
- Capital recovery factor
- Computing1/year
- Annualised terminal CAPEX
- ComputingEUR/year
- Terminal cost per year
- ComputingEUR/year
- Terminal cost at 5 % WACC
- ComputingEUR/t
- Terminal cost at 10 % WACC
- ComputingEUR/t
Market and cross-checks
11- Charter price vs UNCTAD 2023
- Computingratio
- Charter outside the UNCTAD 2021-2023 range
- Computingbool
- UNCTAD low charter in EUR
- ComputingEUR/d
- UNCTAD high charter in EUR
- ComputingEUR/d
- Route vs Saudi Arabia to Germany
- Computingratio
- Chalmers route length
- Computingkm
- Round trip on the Chalmers route
- Computingd
- Model / Chalmers vessel cost
- Computingratio
- Model / Chalmers fuel cost
- Computingratio
Sensitivities
5 chartsLog in to view this sensitivity chart.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
Log in to view this sensitivity chart.
Sources
64 documented assumptions · 8 sources
- arxiv.orgHampp, Düren, Brown (2023), Import options for chemical energy carriers from renewable sources to Germany, PLOS ONE (arXiv 2107.01092)methanol ship, storage and sea distances (S9-S11 Tables 7-9, Table 2)
- research.chalmers.seHe, Brynolf, Kanchiralla, Grahn (2026), Seaborne imports or domestic production?, Applied Energy 412:127627fleet count Eq. 11, methanol vessel 4 and fuel 3 EUR/MWh (2025), O2 tanker 0.62 MWh/km
- ewi.uni-koeln.deEWI (2024), Global PtX Cost Tool 2.0 Documentation, §3 Eq. 22shuttle shipping cost equation
- publications.tno.nlTNO (2023), Green maritime methanola supply chain cost analysis, R11326, Appendix A: terminal sized to one parcel plus 25 %
- agora-energiewende.orgÖko-Institut (2024), PTX Business Opportunity Analyser Data Documentation v2.2, §11.395 % ship availability, 5 % WACC, port charges excluded
- unctad.orgUNCTAD (2024), Review of Maritime Transport 2024product tanker earnings 32,181 USD/d in 2023 (Clarksons); RMT 2023 and 2022 for the 38,053 and 6,822 USD/d range
- eur-lex.europa.euRegulation (EU) 2023/1805 (FuelEU Maritime), Annex IIMDO/MGO WtT 14.4 gCO2e/MJ, Cf 3.206, LCV 0.0427 MJ/g
- bundesbank.deDeutsche Bundesbank, euro reference rates, annual averages1.0813 USD/EUR (2023)
About
Calculator context
About
Calculator context
A screening model of the sea leg that brings e-methanol to a Methanol-to-Jet plant: an export tank farm, a shuttle of chartered tankers, and an import tank farm. It is built for a feasibility study that has to stand in front of a lender, and answers three questions: how many ships and calls the supply needs, what the sea leg adds to the cost of each tonne of methanol, and what the bunker fuel adds to its carbon intensity (the e_td term).
The cost follows the shuttle equation of the EWI Global PtX Cost Tool 2.0 (Eq. 22): the time charter of the ship-days the cargo uses (it pays ship capital, crew and maintenance), bunker fuel for the laden and the ballast legs, and the two tank farms annualised over their 30-year life. Ship, storage and methanol parameters come from Hampp, Düren and Brown (2023): a 75 kt methanol tanker at 27.8 km/h, 48 h per port call, 0.24 MWh/km, tanks at 169.79 EUR/m3 with 6.25 %/a fixed O&M. The charter price is the 2023 product-tanker average of UNCTAD (32,181 USD/d), the bunker price the 65 EUR/MWh MGO of He et al. (2026), and the fleet count follows their Eq. 11 with the 95 % ship availability of PTX-BOA. Each tank farm holds one parcel plus 25 %, as in TNO (2023). The e_td term uses the FuelEU Maritime default factors of marine gas oil, 90.77 gCO2e/MJ well-to-wake.
The size is the methanol delivered in kt/a, from 50 to 3,000 kt/a (about 6 to 380 t/h for #486/#489 at 8,000 h/a). The parcel is capped at a monthly call: below 900 kt/a each call is a part cargo on a shared chemical tanker that pays ship-days and fuel pro rata of the space it fills, and the tank farms shrink with the parcel. This is a declared design choice; without it, a full 75 kt parcel at 50 kt/a means less than one call a year and a terminal annuity above 100 EUR/t. Above 900 kt/a the tanks stay at one full parcel, so their cost per tonne falls with throughput. The one-way distance is the usage lever, from Denmark (812 km) to Australia (20,284 km) in Hampp's Table 2. A second reference case applies the tanker intensity of He et al. (2026), 4.0 Wh/t.km, for a more conservative bunker figure. A terminal quote goes in as a Customized CAPEX; port and canal dues are not included unless you enter them.
Studies mostly print the whole import chain. The sea-leg split computed here is deduced from ship, fuel and storage parameters, not read from a source; the only printed maritime-only methanol cost found is Chalmers' 4 EUR/MWh vessel and 3 EUR/MWh fuel for 2025 over 10,050 nmi. Run on that route, this model lands close on vessel cost (about 1.07 times) and at about half on fuel with Hampp's energy demand, because Hampp transposes an LOHC tanker and Chalmers also counts auxiliaries on a heavier ship. That gap is shown, not tuned away. Ships are chartered, so the only CAPEX passed to project mode is the two tank farms (battery limit 'installed'); charter, bunker and dues go to variable OPEX.
Model
141 variables — inputs, calculations and outputs, with their dependencies.
Model
141 variables — inputs, calculations and outputs, with their dependencies.
| Variable | Value | Unit | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | kt/a | — | |
| 12174 | km | — | |
| 1 | — | — | |
| 0 | — | — | |
| 45 | EUR/(t/a) | — | |
| 32181 | USD/d | — | |
| 65 | EUR/MWh | — | |
| 0 | EUR/t | — | |
| 0.05 | ratio | — |
| Variable | Formula | Unit | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|
if((<=)+(<)+(>)+(!=)*(!=)+(<)+(>)+(>=)*(<=)+(<=)+(<)+(<)+(<)+(>=)>,,) | bool | ||
| ships | ||
if(*<,/,(**(+*)^)/max((+*)^-,)) | 1/year | ||
if(*<,/,(**(+*)^)/max((+*)^-,)) | 1/year |
| Variable | Formula | Unit | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|
* | t/year | ||
* | MWh/year | ||
min(,/) | t | ||
/* | % | ||
/max(,) | trips/year | ||
ceil() | trips/year | ||
/ | loads/year | ||
* | km | ||
/ | h | ||
+* | h | ||
/ | d | ||
/max(,)* | % | ||
* | d/year | ||
/(**) | ships | ||
max(,ceil()) | ships | ||
* | h/year | ||
/max(,) | ratio | ||
/* | % | ||
if(==,,*/) | MWh/km | ||
*/ | Wh/(t.km) | ||
*/ | MWh/t | ||
* | MWh/year | ||
* | MWh/year | ||
/max(,)* | % | ||
*// | t/year | ||
* | t/year | ||
+/ | gCO2e/MJ | ||
**/ | tCO2e/year | ||
/max(,)* | gCO2e/MJ | ||
/ | EUR/d | ||
* | EUR/year | ||
* | EUR/year | ||
* | EUR/year | ||
*(+*)/(*) | m3 | ||
* | m3 | ||
**(+*)/(*)*/(*) | EUR/(t/a) | ||
clamp(*(max(,)/)^(-),,) | EUR/(t/a) | ||
if(>=,,) | EUR/(t/a) | ||
* | EUR | ||
* | MEUR | ||
/max(,) | EUR/m3 | ||
if(<,/,(*(+)^)/max((+)^-,)) | 1/year | ||
* | EUR/year | ||
** | EUR/year | ||
+ | EUR/year | ||
++ | EUR/year | ||
+ | EUR/year | ||
/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
+++ | EUR/t | ||
/ | EUR/MWh | ||
/ | EUR/MWh | ||
/ | EUR/MWh | ||
/max(,)* | % | ||
* | EUR/t | ||
*(+*)/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
*(+*)/max(,) | EUR/t | ||
/ | ratio | ||
/ | EUR/d | ||
/ | EUR/d | ||
if((<)+(>)>,,) | bool | ||
/ | ratio | ||
* | km | ||
(*/+*)/ | d | ||
*/// | EUR/MWh | ||
***// | EUR/MWh | ||
/ | ratio | ||
/ | ratio |
Assumptions
64 assumptions used in the calculations
Assumptions
64 assumptions used in the calculations
Guards divisions against zero.
Market range Exact.
0.000001ConventionLiteral zero for guards.
Market range Exact.
0ConventionLiteral one.
Market range Exact.
1ConventionFraction to percent.
Market range Exact.
100ConventionPercent to fraction.
Market range Exact.
0.01ConventionHours in a day.
Market range Exact.
24h/dConventionCalendar days used for ship availability (He et al. 2026 Eq. 11 uses 365).
Market range Exact.
365d/yearConventionkt to t.
Market range Exact.
1000t/ktConventionkg to t, used to express the density in t/m3.
Market range Exact.
0.001t/kgConvention1 MWh = 3,600 MJ.
Market range Exact.
3600MJ/MWhConvention1 MWh = 1e6 Wh.
Market range Exact.
1000000Wh/MWhConvention1 t = 1e6 g.
Market range Exact.
1000000g/tConventionEUR to million EUR.
Market range Exact.
0.000001MEUR/EURConventionA dedicated shuttle sails laden out and returns in ballast, so the sea distance counts twice in time and fuel.
Market range Not applicable (shuttle convention).
2EWI 2024 Eq. 22One loading call at the export port and one unloading call at the import port per round trip.
Market range Not applicable (shuttle convention).
2Hampp 2023 Table 9The chain has an export and an import tank farm of the same size.
Market range Not applicable.
2TNO 2023 Appendix ASelector value for the Hampp et al. 2023 tanker energy demand.
Market range Not applicable.
1SelectorSelector value for the He et al. 2026 O2 tanker intensity.
Market range Not applicable.
2SelectorThe parcel is capped at one twelfth of the yearly volume: at least one call a month. Without the cap, a 75 kt parcel at 50 kt/a means less than one call a year and tanks sized to a full ship, a non-physical regime where the terminal annuity alone passes 100 EUR/t. Below 900 kt/a each call is therefore a part cargo on a shared chemical tanker, and the cargo pays ship-days and bunker pro rata of the space it fills. This is a design choice declared here, not a sourced value.
Market range Monthly is a common minimum for a feedstock supply contract; no source fixes it.
12calls/yearOpenJack design ruleThroughput at which the monthly parcel reaches the full 75 kt ship, so the tank farms stop growing. It is the size of the cost anchor: two full-parcel tank farms.
Market range Moves with ship size and call rule; fixed here.
900kt/aDerived from the parcel ruleThe tank farms are sized to the parcel, not to the yearly throughput. Above 900 kt/a the parcel is a full ship, so the terminal CAPEX no longer grows with throughput: exponent 0 on throughput, and the CAPEX per t/a falls as 1/throughput. Below 900 kt/a the tanks follow the monthly parcel and the CAPEX per t/a is flat. Not an economy of scale of the tanks themselves, which Hampp prices per m3.
Market range 0 above 900 kt/a, 1 below (on throughput).
0TNO 2023 parcel sizingLower guard of the specific terminal CAPEX. The model value reaches 13.4 EUR/(t/a) at 3,000 kt/a, so the guard never binds inside the slider range.
Market range Not applicable.
5EUR/(t/a)GuardUpper guard of the specific terminal CAPEX. The model value is at most 44.7 EUR/(t/a), so the guard never binds inside the slider range.
Market range Not applicable.
100EUR/(t/a)GuardConverts tonnes into energy for the EUR/MWh results and for e_td.
Market range5.53611MWh/tHampp 2023 S11 Table 9Liquid methanol density used to size the tank farms.
Market range792kg/m3Hampp 2023 S10 Table 8Cargo of one tanker; also the full parcel.
Market range Chemical tankers 10-50 kt; Chalmers uses a 156,000 dwt tanker.
75000tHampp 2023 S11 Table 9Sets sailing time and ship-days. About 15 knots.
Market range Product tankers sail 12-15 kn.
27.8km/hHampp 2023 S11 Table 9Time in port at each end of the round trip; charter is paid for it, bunker in port is not counted.
Market range No independent range cited.
48hHampp 2023 S11 Table 9Default tanker energy reference (3.2 Wh/t.km). A value transposed from an LOHC tanker, hence medium evidence; the Chalmers case shows the gap.
Market range0.24MWh/kmHampp 2023 S11 Table 9Second tanker energy reference, rescaled to the 75 kt cargo by its intensity per t (4.0 Wh/t.km): 0.30 MWh/km.
Market range0.62MWh/kmHe et al. 2026 §3.2Used to turn the Chalmers per-ship demand into a per-t intensity.
Market range Not applicable.
156000tHe et al. 2026 §3.2Share of the year a ship can sail; sets the fleet count.
Market range No independent range cited.
95%PTX-BOA 2024 §11.3.2Default time-charter price. A fleet-weighted product-tanker average, dominated by MR/LR sizes; pairing it with a 75 kt parcel is slightly optimistic, as the rate does not vary with ship size here.
Market range32181USD/dUNCTAD RMT 2024Top of the published range; drives the out-of-range flag.
Market range38053USD/dUNCTAD RMT 2023Bottom of the published range (a 2021 spot rate, not a time charter); drives the out-of-range flag.
Market range6822USD/dUNCTAD RMT 2022Converts the 2023 charter rate into EUR 2023, the currency year of the result.
Market range Annual average.
1.0813USD/EURBundesbank / ECBConverts the 2022 UNCTAD high rate at its own year.
Market range Annual average.
1.053USD/EURBundesbank / ECBConverts the 2021 UNCTAD low rate at its own year.
Market range Annual average.
1.1827USD/EURBundesbank / ECBDefault bunker price, and the fixed price of the Chalmers cross-check.
Market range No independent range cited.
65EUR/MWhHe et al. 2026 §3.2Upstream emissions of the bunker fuel.
Market range Regulatory default.
14.4gCO2e/MJFuelEU Annex IICombustion CO2e per g of MGO, CH4 and N2O included.
Market range Regulatory default.
3.2609gCO2e/gFuelEU Annex II via VesonStack CO2 per g of MGO.
Market range Regulatory default.
3.206gCO2/gFuelEU Annex IITurns fuel mass into energy.
Market range Regulatory default.
0.0427MJ/gFuelEU Annex IIInstalled tank cost per m3 for both tank farms. Jetties, loading arms and pipework are not in this figure, hence not in the model.
Market range No independent range cited.
169.79EUR/m3Hampp 2023 S9 Table 7Service life of the tank farms; annuity period and the lifetime exported to project mode.
Market range No independent range cited.
30yearsHampp 2023 S9 Table 7Fixed O&M of the tank farms, as a share of CAPEX.
Market range No independent range cited.
6.25%/yearHampp 2023 S9 Table 7Each tank farm holds one parcel plus 25 %.
Market range No independent range cited.
25%TNO 2023 Appendix ADefault of the discount-rate input and the 5 % terminal-cost output.
Market range5%PTX-BOA 2024 §11.3.1High-WACC terminal-cost output.
Market range10%Hampp 2023 S7Default route and the reference of the route ratio.
Market range12174kmHampp 2023 Table 2Lower end of the distance input; shorter routes are flagged invalid.
Market range812kmHampp 2023 Table 2Upper end of the distance input; longer routes are flagged invalid.
Market range20284kmHampp 2023 Table 2Converts the Chalmers route length.
Market range Exact.
1.852km/nmiBIPMRoute of the Chalmers cross-check (18,613 km).
Market range Not applicable.
10050nmiHe et al. 2026 §2.4The only printed maritime-only vessel cost for methanol found; compared with this model run on the same route.
Market range Single point.
4EUR/MWhHe et al. 2026 §3.2Printed maritime fuel cost for methanol; compared with this model on the same route.
Market range Single point.
3EUR/MWhHe et al. 2026 §3.2Low end of the Chalmers 2050 shipping cost across non-LH2 carriers (methanol, ammonia, LOHC...). A wider scope than this calculator (other carriers, 2050, port storage), shown as an outer reference only.
Market range8EUR/MWhHe et al. 2026 §3.2High end of the same range, outer reference only.
Market range22EUR/MWhHe et al. 2026 §3.2Charter-based shuttle model: the time charter pays ship capital, crew and maintenance for the ship-days used; bunker is paid on top per km sailed; the two terminals are annualised at the discount rate. Bunker burned in port and refuelling costs are not modelled.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—EWI 2024 Eq. 22Fleet = ship-days / (365 x 95 %), rounded up. Costs use the fractional ship-days (pay-per-use charter); the rounded fleet and its load penalty show what a dedicated fleet would cost.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—He et al. 2026 Eq. 11Most studies print the whole import chain (production + conversion + shipping + storage). The sea-leg cost of this calculator is computed from ship, fuel and storage parameters; it is not read from a source. Only Chalmers prints a maritime-only methanol cost (vessel 4 + fuel 3 EUR/MWh in 2025 over 18,613 km). Every EUR/t figure derived from Chalmers' EUR/MWh, every bound and the e_td magnitude are deduced here.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—OpenJack scope noteRun on the Chalmers route at the same fuel price, this model gives about half the Chalmers fuel cost with Hampp's energy demand, and about 0.6 of it with the Chalmers intensity. Vessel cost lands close (about 1.07). The gap is published, not tuned away: Chalmers also counts auxiliaries and a heavier tanker. Choose the Chalmers reference case for a conservative fuel figure.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—OpenJack cross-checkNot in the model: port dues and canal charges (input, 0 by default), jetties and loading arms, terminal electricity, bunker in port, methanol losses in transfer, inland legs (#304 covers static storage). The charter rate does not vary with ship size.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—OpenJack scope noteThe 169.79 EUR/m3 is read as an installed tank cost without owner's costs. Exported as battery limit 'installed': project mode adds its working-capital layer and contingency only. Ships are chartered, so they carry no CAPEX.
Market range Not applicable (method).
—OpenJack reading of Hampp 2023