Skip to main content

Energy mass balanceCostingEquipment sizingStorage

CO2 battery charging train: compression with heat to the TES, from the atmospheric dome to liquid storage

Charging side of an Energy Dome-type CO2 battery: CO2 compressed from 1 atm to about 70 bar with its heat sent hot to the TES (about 440 °C), ambient condensation with an explicit feasibility limit, compressor CAPEX and service cost per tonne.

  • CurrencyEUR 2023
  • Battery limitinstalled
  • 82 documented assumptions
  • Updated2 Nov 2026

Mass and energy balance

What the asset draws and delivers for the case and load you choose.

Reference case

Full charge cycles a year (Girelli et al. 2025 use 300). The usage lever of the service cost.

Flows

  • In: Electricity for charging—
  • In: CO2 gas from the dome (1 atm)—

Asset

CO2 battery charging train (CO2 compression with heat to the TES, ambient condensation)

  • Out: Liquid CO2 to storage vessels—
  • Out: Compression heat to TES—

Annual quantities at the current usage.

Electric power drawn by the compressor train while charging. Energy Dome standard frame: 24 MWe compressor for an 18 MWe turbine and 200 MWh. Above 37 MW the model uses parallel motor trains.

CO2 mass flow while charging
— t/h
Heat to TES
— MW
Heat rejected to dry coolers
— MW
CO2 moved per full charge
— t

CAPEX

Specific cost at this size, what backs it, and how it behaves with scale.

Specific CAPEX at this size

—

Reference size 24 MW

Weiland et al. 2019

Model value: Weiland et al. 2019 integrally geared compressor law. Customized: enter a supplier quote for the compressor equipment; motor and installation are still added by the model.

Compressor equipment cost per kW by charge power (electric)

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

  1. Ex-factory
  2. Installed· this figure
  3. Fully financed
CAPEX at the battery limit—
Working capital, contingencyproject level

Included

  • Equipment
  • Installation, civil works and engineering

Not included

  • Working capital
  • Contingency

Added at project level

  • Working capital layer, from the project settings
  • Contingency, from the project settings

Project figures

Values passed to project mode when this asset is added to a project.

Concept sketch, not to scale · drag to rotate

Electricity for charging in
—
CO2 gas from the dome (1 atm) in
—
Liquid CO2 to storage vessels outMain product
—
Compression heat to TES out
—
CAPEX to the battery limit
—
Fixed O&M
—
Variable O&M, excluding feedstocks
0 EUR/year
Asset lifetime
30 years

Log in to add this asset to a project.

Service cost per tonne liquefied

A standalone indicator for a quick read. Project mode recomputes it for the whole system.

—

  • Service cost: capital—
  • Service cost: O&M—

Linked to the balance above

Full charge cycles a year (Girelli et al. 2025 use 300). The usage lever of the service cost.

Hours of full-power charging per cycle. Energy Dome standard configuration: 24 MW for 10 h. Sets the CO2 moved per cycle and the heat stored per cycle.

Isentropic efficiency of the compression (of each stage in the intercooled cases). 85 % in Girelli et al. 2025 and Yan et al. 2023.

Temperature of the air used by the intercoolers and the dry-cooler condenser. Check condensation at the hot-season temperature: at 70 bar ambient condensation fails above about 26 °C (CO2 critical point 31 °C).

Pressure of the liquid CO2 vessels, which is also the compressor discharge pressure. Energy Dome stores at about 70 bar and ambient temperature. Must stay above the condensing pressure.

Real pre-tax discount rate for the standalone service cost (Girelli et al. 2025: 5 %). Project mode uses its own rate.

Annuity period of the service cost (Girelli et al. 2025: 30 years; Energy Dome: 30+ years).

Service cost per tonne liquefied by full cycles per year

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

Benchmarks

This model's figures against published references and reference cases.

Condensing pressure, bar

34.85 NIST WebBook

54.65 NIST WebBook

68.92 NIST WebBook

73.8 McCollum & Ogden 2006

Reference cases at this size and usage

Log in to compare the reference cases.

All results

Every model output at the current settings, grouped, with the sensitivity charts.

46 outputs · 6 groups · 13 also shown above, dimmed

Service cost

6
Service cost per tonne liquefied
ComputingEUR/t
Service cost: capital
ComputingEUR/t
Service cost: O&M
ComputingEUR/t
CO2 liquefied per year
Computingt/year
Charging hours per year
Computingh/year
Charging capacity factor
Computing%

Size and CAPEX

10
Compressor train CAPEX (installed)
ComputingEUR
CAPEX per kW of charge power
ComputingEUR/kW
Compressor equipment cost per kW
ComputingEUR/kW
Motor cost per kW
ComputingEUR/kW
Installation cost per kW
ComputingEUR/kW
Compressor equipment
ComputingEUR
Drive motor(s)
ComputingEUR
Installation
ComputingEUR
Motor trains
Computingtrains
CAPEX per t/h of liquefaction
ComputingEUR/(t/h)

Compression train

13
Electricity per tonne liquefied
ComputingkWh/t
Shaft work per tonne
ComputingkWh/t
CO2 mass flow while charging
Computingt/h
CO2 mass flow (kg/s)
Computingkg/s
CO2 liquefied per MWh of charge
Computingt/MWh
Compression stages
Computingstages
Pressure ratio per stage
Computing-
Temperature rise per stage
ComputingK
Compressor discharge temperature
Computing°C
CO2 temperature after the TES on discharge
Computing°C
Ambient penalty on compressor work
Computing%
Shaft power
ComputingMW
Motor losses
ComputingMW

Heat and condensation

10
Condensing pressure
Computingbar
Ambient condensation infeasible
Computingflag
Storage pressure above condensing pressure
Computingbar
Margin to the CO2 critical point
ComputingK
Condensing temperature
Computing°C
Condenser heat per tonne
ComputingkWh/t
Heat rejected to dry coolers
ComputingMW
Heat rejected per charge
ComputingMWh
Heat to TES
ComputingMW
Heat to TES per charge
ComputingMWh

Charge cycle and yearly flows

4
CO2 moved per full charge
Computingt
Charging electricity per year
ComputingMWh/year
Heat to TES per year
ComputingMWh/year
Heat rejected and motor losses per year
ComputingMWh/year

Finance

3
Capital recovery factor
Computing1/year
Annualised CAPEX
ComputingEUR/year
Fixed O&M per year
ComputingEUR/year

Sensitivities

6 charts
Service cost components vs cycles per year

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

CAPEX per kW by item vs charge power

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

Electricity per tonne and discharge temperature vs ambient

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

Condensing pressure and margin to storage pressure vs ambient

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

CO2 mass flow and heat rejected vs stage efficiency

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

Condenser heat per tonne vs ambient

Log in to view this sensitivity chart.

About

Calculator context

This calculator models the charging train of a CO2 battery (Energy Dome type). CO2 is drawn from the atmospheric dome and compressed to the liquid storage pressure (about 70 bar). The compression heat goes to the thermal store (TES). The CO2 is then condensed against ambient air in dry coolers and stored as a liquid at ambient temperature.

By default the compression has no cooling to ambient before the TES: the gas leaves the compressor hot and gives its heat to the TES, as in the Energy Dome reference case of Astolfi et al. 2022 (70 bar and 450 °C at the compressor exit). The model gives about 436 °C at 15 °C ambient, 119 kWh_e per tonne and about 2,020 t of CO2 per 24 MW x 10 h charge, against the 2,000 t that IEEE Spectrum (2025) reports for the 200 MWh Sardinia plant. Two intercooled trains stay available as alternative cases: three stages (Yan et al. 2023) and five stages (McCollum & Ogden 2006). They use less work but send much cooler heat (about 146 °C and 91 °C) to the TES.

The compression work uses an ideal-gas polytropic model with an equal pressure ratio per stage (McCollum & Ogden 2006). Cp/Cv comes from NIST: the mean Cp between 20 and 450 °C for the uncooled case, the value at 50 °C for the intercooled cases. Each stage takes its gas at ambient + 5 K, and the condenser works at ambient + 3 K (Yan et al. 2023). The condenser duty is the difference between NIST enthalpies of the gas at 1 atm and of the saturated liquid. The heat sent to the TES equals the shaft work, so the first-law balance closes. On discharge the CO2 leaves the TES 5 K below the compressor exit (Energy Dome 2024).

The condensation limit is explicit. The saturation pressure at the condensing temperature must stay below the storage pressure. At 70 bar ambient condensation fails above an ambient of about 26 °C, and the CO2 critical point (31 °C) is the absolute limit. A flag shows when a chiller would be needed; the chiller is not costed.

The CAPEX covers the compressor, its motor(s) and their installation. It uses the Weiland et al. 2019 DOE cost laws, escalated with CEPCI to 2023 EUR. This is a transposition, because those laws were fitted on high-inlet-pressure sCO2 compressors (evidence medium-low). Dry coolers, condenser and TES are excluded.

The service cost per tonne liquefied adds the annualised CAPEX and 1 % O&M (Girelli et al. 2025). It excludes the charging electricity, which the project prices as the asset's inlet.

Model

133 variables — inputs, calculations and outputs, with their dependencies.

133 variables shown of 133
VariableValueUnitDepends on
24MW—
10h—
300cycles/year—
1——
85%—
15°C—
70bar—
0——
240EUR/kW—
5%—
30years—
VariableFormulaUnitDepends on
if((<=)+(<=)+(<=)+(*>)+(<=)+(>)+(<=)+(>=)+(+<)+(+>)+(<)+(>)+(<)+(>)+(<=)+(<)+(>)+(<)>,,)bool
/kJ/kg·K
(-)/(-)kJ/kg·K
if(==,/(-),/)-
(-)/-
/kJ/kg·K
/-
+°C
**kJ/kg
(-)/kJ/kg·K
+*kJ/kg
*^3+*^2+*+kJ/kg
//EUR2023/USD2017
**MW
*^*/(*)EUR/kW
*ratio
VariableFormulaUnitDepends on
if(==,,if(==,,))stages
**MW
-MW
^(/)-
(+)*(^-)/(*)K
+°C
-°C
/kWh/t
/(*)kWh/t
((+)/(++)-)/%
*/max(,)t/h
*/kg/s
*t
/max(,)t/MWh
*/MW
*MWh
+°C
(-)/kWh/t
*/MW
*MWh
*^3+*^2+*+bar
-K
-bar
if(<,,)flag
*h/year
//%
*t/year
*MWh/year
*MWh/year
(+)*MWh/year
if(>=,,clamp(*(/)^(-),,))EUR/kW
**EUR
ceil(/)trains
**(/)^*EUR
(+)**EUR
++EUR
/(*)EUR/kW
/(*)EUR/kW
/(*)EUR/kW
/max(,)EUR/(t/h)
if(<,/,(*(+)^)/max((+)^-,))1/year
*EUR/year
**EUR/year
/max(,)EUR/t
/max(,)EUR/t
+EUR/t

Assumptions

82 assumptions used in the calculations

  • Lower limit in the input guards and the feasibility flag.

    0
    Numerical constant
  • Unit multiplier in the CRF, the guards and the Customized switch.

    1
    Numerical constant
  • Upper limit of a percentage in the input guards.

    100%
    Numerical constant
  • Converts a percentage (0-100) to a fraction.

    0.01
    Unit conversion
  • Converts MW to kW (and kW to MW by division).

    1000kW/MW
    Unit conversion
  • Converts tonnes to kilograms for the mass flow in kg/s.

    1000kg/t
    Unit conversion
  • Converts degrees Celsius to kelvin in the stage temperature rise.

    273.15K
    Unit conversion
  • 1 kWh/t = 3,600 kJ / 1,000 kg = 3.6 kJ/kg; converts specific work and enthalpy differences to kWh/t.

    3.6kJ/kg per kWh/t
    Unit conversion
  • Value of the technology_case select for the default case.

    1
    Selector identifier
  • Value of the technology_case select for the three-stage case.

    2
    Selector identifier
  • Value of the technology_case select for the five-stage case.

    3
    Selector identifier
  • Default case: one compression section from 1 atm to the storage pressure, no cooling to ambient before the TES. This is what sends the heat to the TES hot, as the Energy Dome reference case does.

    1stages
    Astolfi et al. 2022
  • Stage count of the three-stage intercooled alternative. Yan's system (atmospheric holder, compression with heat-recovery coolers, condenser, liquid tank) intercools to ambient + 5 K, so its heat reaches the TES at about 146 °C only.

    3stages
    Yan et al. 2023
  • Stage count of the CCS-style case: more stages, closer to isothermal, lower work and a cooler discharge, so less useful heat for the TES.

    5stages
    McCollum & Ogden 2006
  • Reference size of the scale law (the Energy Dome standard compressor frame). The Weiland law is written as a ratio to this size; the result is identical to the absolute correlation.

    24MW
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024
  • Suction pressure of the first stage.

    1.01325bar
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024 / NIST
  • Above this condensing temperature no liquid can form at any pressure; the condensation margin is measured against it. NIST gives 30.98 °C.

    31°C
    Energy Dome TMCES 2022
  • Upper guard on the storage pressure: the liquid store must stay subcritical. Also a benchmark for the condensing pressure.

    73.8bar
    McCollum & Ogden 2006
  • Temperature the CO2 regains from the TES on discharge = compressor discharge temperature minus 5 K. Vendor statement, not a measured approach temperature.

    5K
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024
  • Each intercooler returns the gas to ambient + 5 K before the next stage.

    5K
    Yan et al. 2023
  • The CO2 condenses at ambient + 3 K against the dry coolers.

    3K
    Yan et al. 2023
  • Electric-to-shaft efficiency of the drive motor. The motor losses are counted in the heat and losses output.

    98.2%
    ABB 2017
  • Universal gas constant for the ideal-gas compression work.

    8.314kJ/kmol·K
    McCollum & Ogden 2006
  • Molar mass of CO2; R/M = 0.18892 kJ/kg·K.

    44.01kg/kmol
    McCollum & Ogden 2006
  • Numerator of the heat-capacity ratio k = Cp/Cv (1.282) used in the polytropic group (k-1)/k.

    0.87453kJ/kg·K
    NIST WebBook
  • Denominator of the heat-capacity ratio. Taken at 1 atm and 50 °C, inside the stage temperature range; the real-gas departure of the last stage is discussed in scope_real_gas_crosscheck.

    0.68215kJ/kg·K
    NIST WebBook
  • First point of the linear gas-enthalpy line at 1 atm.

    484.87kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • Second point of the linear gas-enthalpy line; slope 0.85082 kJ/kg·K.

    527.41kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • Low end of the mean Cp used for the uncooled case: Cp_mean = (h(450 °C) - h(20 °C)) / 430 K = 1.0111 kJ/kg·K, then k = Cp/(Cp - R) = 1.230.

    501.6kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • High end of the mean Cp of the uncooled case, at the 450 °C compressor exit of Astolfi et al. 2022. Taken at 1 atm (ideal-gas part); the real-gas departure at 70 bar and high temperature is small and not modelled.

    936.36kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • Upper end of the temperature span of the mean Cp (20-450 °C) for the uncooled case, and the published reference against which the computed discharge temperature is read.

    450°C
    Astolfi et al. 2022
  • Lower end of the mean-Cp span (about ambient + 5 K at the 15 °C default).

    20°C
    NIST WebBook
  • Temperature span of the linear gas-enthalpy line (0 to 50 °C).

    50°C
    NIST WebBook
  • Cubic term of the saturated-liquid enthalpy fit. Max error 0.6 kJ/kg on 0-28 °C (checked: 289.05 against NIST 289.62 at 28 °C, 249.05 against 249.26 at 18 °C).

    0.001536kJ/kg·K³
    Fit to NIST
  • Quadratic term of the saturated-liquid enthalpy fit.

    -0.025754kJ/kg·K²
    Fit to NIST
  • Linear term of the saturated-liquid enthalpy fit.

    2.708088kJ/kg·K
    Fit to NIST
  • Constant term of the saturated-liquid enthalpy fit (h at 0 °C).

    199.6866kJ/kg
    Fit to NIST
  • Cubic term of the saturation-pressure fit. Max error 0.008 bar on 0-28 °C (34.846 against 34.851 at 0 °C, 54.649 against 54.651 at 18 °C, 68.910 against 68.918 at 28 °C).

    0.000073bar/K³
    Fit to NIST
  • Quadratic term of the saturation-pressure fit.

    0.008269bar/K²
    Fit to NIST
  • Linear term of the saturation-pressure fit.

    0.927551bar/K
    Fit to NIST
  • Constant term of the saturation-pressure fit (psat at 0 °C).

    34.84566bar
    Fit to NIST
  • Guard: a condensing temperature below 0 °C is outside the fitted range and is refused.

    0°C
    Model domain
  • Guard: a condensing temperature above 28 °C is outside the fitted range and close to the critical point; it is refused. With the 3 K condenser pinch this caps the ambient at 25 °C.

    28°C
    Model domain
  • Reference ambient of the load penalty: the compressor work is compared with the same train at 15 °C.

    15°C
    Girelli et al. 2025
  • Coefficient of the integrally geared centrifugal compressor cost law. Transposed: the correlation is fitted on sCO2 compressors with an inlet at 65-90 bar, here the inlet is at 1 bar.

    1230000USD2017
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Scale exponent of the compressor cost on its shaft power: specific cost falls as size^(0.3992-1). Sourced to a DOE cost-data regression; evidence medium because the low-pressure CO2 duty is a transposition.

    0.3992
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Coefficient of the drive-motor cost law.

    399400USD2017
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Scale exponent of the motor cost.

    0.6062
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Largest single motor the law covers. Above it the model uses parallel motor trains of equal size, as Energy Dome does with its double-compressor layout.

    37MW
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Installation on top of the bare equipment cost (Weiland's correlations are equipment costs).

    20%
    Weiland et al. 2019
  • Cost index of the Weiland base year.

    567.5
    Girelli et al. 2025
  • Cost index of the 2023 reporting year.

    800.8
    Girelli et al. 2025
  • Converts 2023 USD to 2023 EUR after CEPCI escalation.

    1.0813USD/EUR
    ECB
  • Fixed O&M of the compression train per year. Girelli applies it to the whole plant; applied here to the compressor train.

    1%/year
    Girelli et al. 2025
  • Lower clamp of the scaled compressor specific CAPEX. Checked at the slider ends (3 and 135 MW): it never binds.

    20EUR/kW
    Model guard
  • Upper clamp of the scaled compressor specific CAPEX. Checked at the slider ends: it never binds.

    3000EUR/kW
    Model guard
  • Benchmark for the condensing pressure at a cold site.

    34.851bar
    NIST WebBook
  • Benchmark for the condensing pressure at the 15 °C nominal ambient (T_cond 18 °C).

    54.651bar
    NIST WebBook
  • Benchmark at the hottest ambient the model accepts (25 °C, T_cond 28 °C): 1.1 bar below the 70 bar storage pressure.

    68.918bar
    NIST WebBook
  • Check point of the liquid enthalpy fit (fit gives 249.05).

    249.26kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • Check point of the liquid enthalpy fit (fit gives 289.05).

    289.62kJ/kg
    NIST WebBook
  • Discharge side of the reference frame; not used by this charging calculator, given for chaining with the turbine calculator.

    18MW
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024
  • Whole-plant vendor claim, used only as a qualitative ceiling: see scope_vendor_claim_comparison.

    225USD/kWh
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024
  • Upper end of the vendor whole-plant claim.

    250USD/kWh
    Energy Dome TMCES 2024
  • Default charge power 24 MW = the Energy Dome standard compressor frame (24 MWe compressor, 18 MWe turbine, 200 MWh, 10 h). The chain contract range is 2.5-100 MW of discharge, about 3-135 MW of charge.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default 10 h of charging per cycle: '24MW/10h' charging in the Energy Dome standard configuration. The chain contract range is 4-24 h.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default 300 full cycles a year, the Girelli et al. 2025 case (section 5). The usage lever of the service cost.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default isentropic efficiency 85 % (of the compression in the default case, of each stage in the intercooled cases): Girelli et al. 2025 Table 1 ('Compressor isentropic efficiency 85%') and Yan et al. 2023 Table 1 (0.85). Slider 80-90 %.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default ambient 15 °C (Girelli et al. 2025, Table 1). The input binds to the site mean temperature; condensation feasibility must also be checked at the site's hot-season temperature. Slider 0-25 °C: above 25 °C the condensing temperature leaves the fitted NIST range and approaches the 31 °C critical point.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default liquid storage pressure 70 bar: Energy Dome TMCES 2022 slide 4 (CO2 storage 'High (70 bar)', temperature 'CO2 = Ambient'). Slider 65-73 bar, below the 73.8 bar critical pressure.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Default discount rate 5 % and economic life 30 years (Girelli et al. 2025, section 4.2; Energy Dome TMCES 2024 slide 18 '30+ y'). The rate is real: all costs are constant 2023 EUR, nothing is escalated.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Compression work is computed with an ideal-gas polytropic model per stage (McCollum & Ogden 2006 stage equation with Z = 1): stage temperature rise = T_in (r^((k-1)/k) - 1) / eta_is, work = N cp dT. Uncooled default case: k = 1.230 from the NIST mean Cp between 20 and 450 °C at 1 atm (Cv = Cp - R). Intercooled cases: k = 1.282 from NIST Cp/Cv at 1 atm and 50 °C. Equal pressure ratio per stage.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Every stage, the first one included, takes its gas at ambient + 5 K. The first stage actually draws from the dome at about ambient, so the work is overstated by about 1.7 % at 15 °C: a conservative simplification.

    —
    Unspecified
  • First-law split for an ideal gas: enthalpy depends on temperature only, so all shaft work leaves as sensible heat when the gas is cooled back to the stage inlet temperature. Heat to TES = shaft power. The condenser and dry coolers reject h_gas(1 atm, T_in) - h_liq,sat(T_cond) from NIST. The balance W_sh + m h_in = m h_liq + Q_TES + Q_rej closes by construction. In the default case all of this heat leaves the compressor at about 436 °C; in the intercooled cases it is at 91-146 °C. How much the TES can store usefully is the TES calculator's question, not this one's.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Real-gas cross-check: McCollum & Ogden 2006 use per-stage Z and k (stage 5: Z = 0.845, k = 1.704). The research step ran their equation at N = 5, eta 85 %, T_in 20 °C and got 81.5 kWh/t of shaft work; this model gives 84.3 kWh/t at the same point (+3 %). The 81.5 is a computation with McCollum's equation, not a figure printed in the report.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Condensation feasibility is explicit: the CO2 condenses at ambient + 3 K against dry coolers. If the saturation pressure at that temperature exceeds the storage pressure, ambient condensation is impossible without a chiller or water cooling (not modelled, not costed) and the flag shows 1. At 70 bar this happens above about 26 °C ambient; at 65 bar above about 21.5 °C. The critical point (31 °C, 73.8 bar) is the absolute limit.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Scope exclusion: the dry coolers, the condenser and the TES are NOT in the CAPEX. Weiland's dry-cooler law (32.88 UA^0.75) needs a UA that would rest on an unsourced air-side temperature difference. The CAPEX is the compressor, its motor(s) and their installation only.

    —
    Unspecified
  • The Weiland integrally geared compressor law is fitted on sCO2 compressors with an inlet at 65-90 bar (uncertainty -39 %/+48 %). Here the inlet is at 1 bar, so the large low-pressure volumetric flow makes it a transposition: evidence medium-low. The Hendriks CCS compression law quoted by McCollum & Ogden 2006 gives about 1,450 USD(2005)/kW at 24 MW before escalation, an upper envelope that would exceed the vendor whole-plant claim per kW of compressor.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Qualitative comparison only: Energy Dome claims 225-250 USD/kWh for the whole plant (TMCES 2024, 2024 USD), about 45-50 M USD for 200 MWh, i.e. roughly 1,900-2,100 USD per kW of compressor. The modelled compressor train (2023 EUR) is roughly a fifth to a quarter of that. The currency years differ and no 2024 rate is cited, so no position is concluded beyond 'well below the whole-plant claim'.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Chain-contract anchor: IEEE Spectrum (E. Waltz, 21 Dec 2025) reports '2,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide' in the Sardinia dome and '20 MW over 10 hours' (200 MWh). The default case gives 201.7 t/h, i.e. about 2,017 t per 24 MW x 10 h charge (+0.8 %) at 119.0 kWh_e/t. This is an independent check: the 2,000 t enters no node. The intercooled cases give 2,622 t (three stages) and 2,797 t (five stages), 31-40 % above: the TES and discharge calculators should be chained to the default case.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Service cost = (annualised CAPEX + fixed O&M) / tonnes liquefied per year. It excludes the value of the charging electricity: the electricity is the inlet of the asset and the project prices it; counting it here would double count. No revenue, tax or subsidy. Constant 2023 EUR, real discount rate.

    —
    Unspecified
  • Corners of the input box (cases 1-3, efficiency 80-90 %, ambient 0-25 °C, storage pressure 65-73 bar): specific electricity 75.4-132.6 kWh_e/t (top end: uncooled case, 80 %, 25 °C, 73 bar); compressor exit 67-494 °C (above 450 °C the mean Cp is a short extrapolation); condenser heat 61.5-78.2 kWh_th/t; condensing pressure 37.7-68.9 bar. CAPEX 369-732 EUR/kW over 10-37 MW of charge power; below 10 MW it rises above the stored bound (about 824 EUR/kW at 3 MW), above 37 MW parallel motors bring it to about 260-370 EUR/kW. The service cost spans about 0.08-97 EUR/t over all corners of size, duration, cycles and finance; the stored bound covers the nominal case and the plotted sweeps.

    —
    Unspecified